What if The Masters of Photography Used Horrendous Watermarks?


Filed under Musings on Photography.


Idle thought today while at work was how it seems like many amateur photographs spend more time putting elaborate watermarks on their images than they do making images worth stealing. This led to a second thought that I don't really recall ever seeing the photographs of famous art photographers with a gaudy watermark. This in turn led to one more thought...

What if the masters of photography used horrendous watermarks?

Henri Cartier-Bresson Steve McCurry Joel-Peter Witkin Andreas Gursky William Eggelston Sally Mann Alec Soth Garry Winogrand

Well wasn't that just a ball of fun? Here are a few more links to some other fun satire posts about famous photographers in the Internet age.

  • http://peoplewho.tumblr.com wireless G

    This page is hilarious and spot on. In my experience, the worse the photographer, the more prominent and gaudy the watermark. IMHO, the reason these are 'stolen' less isn't because of the identifying information, but because they make the photo look just awful.

  • http://www.joushikijin.com/ Dénis Wettmann

    Re-reading the comments made me realise that a lot of people are willing to deface their own work, just because they are worried someone else will use or abuse it. Paranoid creatures...

  • Pingback: Information - Some recent pics from a walk and visit